1 in 31

I’m playing in a World Series of Poker satellite this afternoon. At least 150 people from this event are going to the real deal in Las Vegas next week. (If it was just the $10,000 entry fee, then I’d probably not be playing, but they’re throwing in $1,000 “spending money”, which should just barely get me there, eating a few days, and flying back.)

I don’t play satellites, and I don’t play MTTs, and I don’t play in anything this large, but I’m looking at it as a long shot to a long shot, and just having fun. The experience should be worth it. (And if I make the WSOP, then same philosophy: zero expectation, and just play as well as you can.)

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to 1 in 31

  1. Christie points out that the audience of THIS blog might not know that an MTT is a multi-table tournament. It’s a whole different strategy than a single table tournament, and different again from a typical cash game. I don’t have a lot of experience here because I tend not to have eight-hour blocks of time I can devote to a single game. If I did, I think the format appeals to me.

  2. I survived three hours, but that was about three hours short of what I needed to do. I’m happy with the way I played it, but I know good MTT players find ways to accumulate chips even if they aren’t getting cards. I found a way to stay breakeven until the blinds got too big, but it just wasn’t my day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>